Vol. 62, No. 3 (2011) Lead Articles Edition - The Brain Sciences in the Courtroom
Front Matter
Articles
Foreward: The Brain Sciences and Criminal Law Norms
Theodore Y. Blumoff
Avoiding Irrational NeuroLaw Exuberance: A Plea for Neuromodesty
Stephen J. Morse
Brain Scans as Evidence: Truths, Proofs, Lies, and Lessons
Francis X. Shen and Owen D. Jones
Functional Magnetic Resonance Detection of Deception: Great as Fundamental Research, Inadequate as Substantive Evidence
Charles Adelsheim
Life, Death, and Neuroimaging: The Advantages and Disadvantages of the Defense's Use of Neuroimages in Capital Cases -Lessons from the Front
John H. Blume and Emily C. Paavola
Neuropsychiatry in the Courtroom
Richard L. Elliott
Neuroscience Basics for Lawyers
Oliver R. Goodenough and Micaela Tucker
Serendipitous Timing: The Coincidental Emergence of the New Brain Science and the Advent of an Epistemological Approach to Determining the Admissibility of Expert Testimony
Edward J. Imwinkelried
Ten Legal Dissonances
Morris B. Hoffman
Transcript
Casenotes
Schoolhouse Rock: Lessons of Homosexual Tolerance in Keeton v. Anderson-Wiley from the Classroom to the Constitution
Billie Pritchard
Taking a Bite Out of Speech Regulation: The Supreme Court Upholds First Amendment Protection for Depictions of Animal Cruelty in United States v. Stevens
J. Matthew Barnwell
Table of Cases
Board of Editors
- Elizabeth Bowen Reichert - Editor-in-Chief
- Cassidy M. Flake - Senior Managing Editor
- Adrienne R. Bershinsky - Managing Editor
- Jody L. Sellers - Managing Editor
- Stephen M. Floyd - Georgia Survey Editor
- Courtney E. Ferrell - Lead Articles Editor
- Hayley S. Strong - Articles Editor
- Jeffrey J. Costolnick -11th Circuit Survey Editor
- Corrie E. Holton - Student Writing Editor
- Whitney C. Johnson - Administrative Editor