Rituals of Reluctance: How Loper Bright Further Obscures Civil Rights’ Place in the Modern Administrative State

Authors

Cameron K. Obioha

Publication Date

4-2025

Document Type

Comment

Abstract

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (Loper Bright)marks the end of the Chevron doctrine and the abandonment of nearly forty years of precedent. Despite providing extensive reasoning regarding why eliminating an anchor of administrative law is the culmination of long‑awaited progress, no member of the Supreme Court of the United States elected to opine on a crucial implication of this historic decision. The court did not address how, with reinstated dominion over “every open issue” in regulatory law, it will reconcile the ever‑widening chasm between civil rights policy and the modern administrative state when such challenges inevitably arise.

Recommended Citation

Obioha, Cameron K. (2025) "Rituals of Reluctance: How Loper Bright Further Obscures Civil Rights’ Place in the Modern Administrative State," Mercer Law Review: Vol. 76: No. 2, Article 10.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol76/iss2/10