In Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, the United States Supreme Court held that while the Daubert factors for determining the admissibility of expert testimony are neither determinative nor exhaustive, the gatekeeping function articulated in Daubert requires an examination of the reliability of all types of expert testimony and is not limited in application to scientific expert testimony.
"Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael: Daubert's Gatekeeping Method Expanded to Apply to All Expert Testimony,"
Mercer Law Review: Vol. 51
, Article 15.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol51/iss4/15