This article will discuss the resolution of conflicting claims to goods between an unsecured seller of goods and a creditor of a buyer claiming under an after-acquired property clause. The problem is complicated by the lack of a coherent relationship among the rules of the Uniform Commercial Code' relevant to the problem. The U.C.C. has abandoned the concept of title in personal property,2 but has failed to replace the concept with a comprehensive system that can definitively and convincingly resolve controversies arising out of conflicting claims.
Kamp, Allen R. and Solove, Ronald L.
"Seller vs. Secured Party: Searching for an Intangible Something,"
Mercer Law Review: Vol. 28:
3, Article 4.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.mercer.edu/jour_mlr/vol28/iss3/4